compiler errorの例文

例文携帯版

Static types need not be explicitly declared unless a compiler error indicates the need.
Type checking is done at compile time, and attempting to access a nonexistent field will cause a compiler error.
Ordinary compiler errors state a line number in the . cpp file, but here there are no line numbers, just a lot of weird information.
In a " type system " with automated type checking a program may prove to run incorrectly yet be safely typed, and produce no compiler errors.
According to Java theory and practice : Generics gotchas ( Construction delays ), I should ( and in fact do ) get a compiler error : Cannot instantiate the type T.
Because clone ( ) is essentially a default constructor ( one that has no arguments ) it is impossible to assign a final field within a clone ( ) method; a compiler error is the result.
In most other programming languages, this would not be possible ( deleting a block-end marker in C would lead to a compiler error ), and this makes the Python syntax less robust than most other languages.
Also, there is additional need for testing that no code anywhere ever assigns null instead of the Null Object, because in most cases and languages with static typing, this is not a compiler error if the Null Object is of a reference type, although it would certainly lead to errors at run time in parts of the code where the pattern was used to avoid null checks.